The prosecution offered no evidence in relation to the possession of an UZI 9mm sub-machine gun. Graeme Logan representing the defendant, with the assistance of renowned firearms expert William Harriman, successfully persuaded the prosecution that the viable pistol grip from the otherwise de-activated gun could not be considered a “relevant component part” for the purposes of the Firearms Act 1968.
Graeme Logan was instructed by Abigail Ashford at the Stokoe Partnership.
